Blog 2: Validly Practice
Blog 5: Discuss Ishmael
Abby Summerlin, Scott Thomas Stanley, I'Yari Ah'Shanyk Wade, Meseker Worku Kebede 10/17/2022 1:30 - 2:00 In our discussion of Ishmael, I personally stuck to my groups response when asked about the narrator told Ishmael he wished he meet him when he was 17. Since everyone in our group was close to the age of 17, we talked about how we felt about how learning how to think at that age is so important for the rest of our lives. While I don't think younger people are better to save the world, I think learning this information at such a young age gives you the time to use it and also allows you to fully comprehend how to do so. We also spoke about how interesting we found Ishmael view on Giver and Takers. Many of the members of my group thought that Ishmael had the right to view Giver and Takers the way he did but we also mentioned that there wasn't any middle ground with Ishmael. You were either a "nature lover" or trying to ruin the world and many of my group mem...
5 is valid because we know that both P and Q are true. That means if the conclusion is Q then it is valid because we already know it is true. For example, 1. You play the lottery (P) 2. You win the lottery (Q) Conclusion you won the lottery since we already know that is true
ReplyDelete11 and 13 are not valid because it's either or, so when you "or" it is always inclusive. You cannot assume that one is wrong or none is right. For example, 1. You win the lottery (P) 2.You've played the lottery (Q). If you do win the lottery (2) then the conclusion is that you did not play the lottery but that is not true. You can play the lottery and not win.